Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks don’t carry their axes generally around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a village club in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some unsuspecting slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip streaming web sites, where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down vapor, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of cash. He is a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this is one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a tremendously quiet man. He just stepped in extremely calmly with an axe and smashed all the machines. There were several customers by them during the time and they had been terrified,’ he included.
As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an unpleasant weapon. But prison overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of the two stories is just a bit more terrifying, as the axe was wielded not during the slots, but at a member of the employees at a betting shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or even worse if he did not comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both using ski masks, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm on the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant utilizing the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of money,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the neighborhood public for information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each and every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposition that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate option is regarding the concept that neighboring communities is afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos must be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, is one of a handful of candidates who have recommended that all of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, for instance.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it could have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed advantages.’
Based on the state laws that produced the chance of three brand new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate payment, with arbitration required in the event that gambling enterprises and neighborhood governments can’t arrive at a resolution on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power throughout the entire vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley have not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston world survey discovered that six regarding the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in support of it, with only two coming down against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Regardless if voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii as the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading activities company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the large donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of this largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large number of wagering outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the local roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with betting shops and pay day loan companies that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public areas and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
But, fighting back in the corner regarding the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance utilizing the rules and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working office of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for company, as well as for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is no further a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a entirely innocent donation or not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are searching to ruin the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this type of hard stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he certainly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is considered to be a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this present year his royal resort hotel las vegas office ended up being accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to exhibit comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.